|
|
|
@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ but it scales phenomenally better. While poll and select usually scale
|
|
|
|
|
like O(total_fds) where n is the total number of fds (or the highest fd),
|
|
|
|
|
epoll scales either O(1) or O(active_fds). The epoll design has a number
|
|
|
|
|
of shortcomings, such as silently dropping events in some hard-to-detect
|
|
|
|
|
cases and rewuiring a syscall per fd change, no fork support and bad
|
|
|
|
|
cases and rewiring a syscall per fd change, no fork support and bad
|
|
|
|
|
support for dup:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While stopping, setting and starting an I/O watcher in the same iteration
|
|
|
|
|