|
|
|
@ -376,8 +376,10 @@ otherwise each loop using C<ev_stat> watchers consumes one inotify handle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When this flag is specified, then libev will attempt to use the
|
|
|
|
|
I<signalfd> API for it's C<ev_signal> (and C<ev_child>) watchers. This API
|
|
|
|
|
delivers signals synchronously, which makes is both faster and might make
|
|
|
|
|
it possible to get the queued signal data.
|
|
|
|
|
delivers signals synchronously, which makes it both faster and might make
|
|
|
|
|
it possible to get the queued signal data. It can also simplify signal
|
|
|
|
|
handling with threads, as long as you properly block signals in your
|
|
|
|
|
threads that are not interested in handling them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signalfd will not be used by default as this changes your signal mask, and
|
|
|
|
|
there are a lot of shoddy libraries and programs (glib's threadpool for
|
|
|
|
@ -2162,10 +2164,9 @@ unless you use the C<signalfd> API (C<EV_SIGNALFD>). While this reduces
|
|
|
|
|
the window of opportunity for problems, it will not go away, as libev
|
|
|
|
|
I<has> to modify the signal mask, at least temporarily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So I can't stress this enough I<if you do not reset your signal mask
|
|
|
|
|
when you expect it to be empty, you have a race condition in your
|
|
|
|
|
program>. This is not a libev-specific thing, this is true for most event
|
|
|
|
|
libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
So I can't stress this enough: I<If you do not reset your signal mask when
|
|
|
|
|
you expect it to be empty, you have a race condition in your code>. This
|
|
|
|
|
is not a libev-specific thing, this is true for most event libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
=head3 Watcher-Specific Functions and Data Members
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|