|
|
|
@ -420,8 +420,8 @@ extra overhead. A fork can both result in spurious notifications as well
|
|
|
|
|
as in libev having to destroy and recreate the epoll object, which can
|
|
|
|
|
take considerable time and thus should be avoided.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All this means that, in practise, C<EVBACKEND_SELECT> can be as fast or
|
|
|
|
|
faster then epoll for maybe up to a hundred file descriptors, depending on
|
|
|
|
|
All this means that, in practice, C<EVBACKEND_SELECT> can be as fast or
|
|
|
|
|
faster than epoll for maybe up to a hundred file descriptors, depending on
|
|
|
|
|
the usage. So sad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While nominally embeddable in other event loops, this feature is broken in
|
|
|
|
|